Skip to main content

Converting a Spring SimpleFormController into an @Controller

In my previous post, I showed how to convert a Spring web controller class to use the @Controller annotation. In this post, I aim to show how forms in a Spring MVC application can also be converted to using annotations.

Forms in Spring are typically modelled by extending the org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.SimpleFormController class, but using Spring annotations, they can also be simplified and defined by the @Controller annotation.

Without annotations, a SimpleFormController would be defined as below as in both a Java class and as a bean in XML.

import org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.SimpleFormController 
  
public class PriceIncreaseFormController extends SimpleFormController { 
  
    public ModelAndView onSubmit(Object command) { 
        // Submit the form 
    } 
      
    protected Object formBackingObject(HttpServletRequest request) 
        throws ServletException { 
        // Initialize the form 
    } 
}

<bean name="/priceincrease.htm" class="springapp.web.PriceIncreaseFormController"> 
    <property name="commandName" value="priceIncrease"/> 
    <property name="commandClass" value="springapp.service.PriceIncrease"/> 
    <property name="validator"> 
        <bean class="springapp.service.PriceIncreaseValidator"/> 
    </property> 
    <property name="formView" value="priceincrease"/> 
    <property name="successView" value="home.htm"/> 
</bean>

To convert the class to use annotations, we need to add an @Controller and @RequestMapping annotation.  We can then define a simple POJO controller that does not need to extend Spring's classes.

@Controller
@RequestMapping("/priceincrease.htm") 
public class PriceIncreaseFormController { 
 
    @Autowired
    private PriceIncreaseValidator priceIncreaseValidator; 
  
    @RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.POST) 
    public String onSubmit(@ModelAttribute("priceIncrease")PriceIncrease priceIncrease, 
        BindingResult result) { 
          
        int increase = priceIncrease.getPercentage(); 
        priceIncreaseValidator.validate(increase, result); 
        if (result.hasErrors()) 
            return "priceIncrease"; 
          
        // Validator has succeeded. 
        // Perform necessary actions and return to success page. 
        return "redirect:home.htm"; 
    } 
      
    @RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.GET) 
    public String initializeForm(ModelMap model) { 
        // Perform and Model / Form initialization
        Map<Integer, String> priority = new LinkedHashMap<Integer, String>();
        priority.put(1, "Low");
        priority.put(2, "Normal");
        priority.put(3, "High");
 
        model.addAttribute("priorityList", priority);
  
        return "priceincrease"; 
    } 
  
    // Other getters and setters an needed. 
}

After defining the class like this, there is no need for the class to be defined within the Spring Context XML file.

The two methods outlined above in this simple class show how the initializeForm() method is called when an HTTP GET request is made to the form and how the form is submitted in the onSubmit() method via a HTTP POST request.  The method called on a GET request is used to initialize the form, whereas the method called on a POST request is called when the form is submitted.

The final thing to notice from this class is that the validation has to be explicitly called within the onSubmit() method.  In this example, the PriceValidator is injected into the class via the @Autowired annotation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Creating a Joke Application in React

Introduction I've recently started learning React. I've been a backend developer for a long time, but have started to love doing client side work. As they say, the best way to learn is to practise. So here is a simple joke application that I've written in React. The source code for the application can be found on GitHub at: https://github.com/doobrie/react-joke Creating the project Whilst practising, I've quite often created projects from scratch, but this is quite tedious as the same steps need to be taken for each project. I needed to create the project structure, configure Babel, write some control scripts etc. Instead of doing that this time, I've used the create-react-app tool to scaffold the basics of an application. npx create-react-app This sets up everything that you need to get started with a React app. Coding As this is a simple project, I've created one react component, function app() . I've created this as a functional c...

Changing Default Search Provider in Firefox on Linux Mint

On Linux Mint, the default version of Firefox is installed and configured to allow the following search engines to be queried directly from the address bar: Yahoo! Startpage DuckDuckGo Wikipedia Mint defines these as the default available set of search engines based upon 3 criteria (funding to Linux Mint, privacy support and whether the search engine is non-commercial). Other search engines such as Google, Bing or Twitter, etc. can easily be added into the default version of Firefox however. To add a different search provider, browse to Search Engines At the bottom of the page, click on the icon of the requested search engine, then click on the ... button in the URL bar and select the Add Search Engine option. You then have the option to change the default search engine within Firefox preferences to your new choice.

The new Eclipse logo

In a blog post today, Ian Skerrett has announced the new logo for Eclipse. Last fall we [The Eclipse Foundation] started a process to  update the Eclipse logo . The existing logo had not been change since Eclipse was launched and it was showing its age. I am happy to announce we have finished the process and am pleased to introduce the updated Eclipse logo. The new logo has a fresh modern look to it, which I think is a good improvement and will stand Eclipse in good stead for the future. The new logo will be included with the next Eclipse release train, Luna, and gradually rolled out across the Eclipse site and projects. What do you think?  Do you like the new logo?  Add your comments below.